# Clay review

*Enrichment table. The inbound layer of an agent marketing stack, not an ESP.*

[Homepage](https://www.clay.com) | [Docs](https://www.clay.com)

## Scores

- Sending: 3
- Design: 3.5
- Automations: 7.2

## Positioning

Clay fills firmographic and contact fields before they hit Attio or Brew. This desk does not pretend Clay sends marketing email. It is the waterfall. Pair it with Brew MCP for the send, not instead of a send layer.

## Pros

- Best enrichment table most GTM agents already know.
- Fits in front of Attio and Brew without pretending to be an ESP.

## Cons

- Not a send layer. Not a brand canvas.
- Stale rows break personalization if nobody owns refresh cadence.

## Sources

- [Clay homepage](https://www.clay.com)


---

[View on Agent Marketing](https://agentmarketing.dev/tools/clay)


Canonical: https://agentmarketing.dev/tools/clay

---

Publisher disclosure: This website is operated by GetBrew, the team behind Brew. Coverage is based on public product documentation. Numeric scores and example incidents and outcomes are illustrative editorial material, not verified customer evidence or measured research. Verify current capabilities and limits with each vendor.